site stats

Hangartner v city of seattle

WebACLU v. City of Seattle was a case before the Washington Court of Appeals in 2009 concerning the records of police union negotiations. Important precedents. This case … WebAug 2, 2024 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wash.2d 439, 447, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) (citing Wood v. Lowe, 102 Wash. App. 872, 878, 10 P.3d 494 (2000) ). Agencies are not required to read minds. ... Rufin v. City of Seattle, 199 Wash. App. 348, 363, 398 P.3d 1237 (2024). While the PRA defines costs to include attorney fees, it only allows costs (and …

Decisions from Vol. 90 of P.3d Reporter Series Leagle

WebHANGARTNER v. CITY OF SEATTLE Email Print Comments (0) No. 73930-7. View Case; Cited Cases; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . Listed below are those cases in which … WebIn Hangartner v. City of Seattle, the Supreme Court held that RCW 5.60.060(2)(a), the attorney-client privilege statute, provided an “other statute” exemption. 151 Wn.2d 439, 453, 90 P.3d 26 (2004). That statute stated that “[a]n … mcc thunderstorms https://aurorasangelsuk.com

Washington Public Records Act - Ballotpedia

WebJun 9, 2009 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 452, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) (quoting Kammerer v. W. Gear Corp., 96 Wn.2d 416, 421, 635 P.2d 708 (1981)); RCW … WebMay 31, 2024 · LYFT, INC. and Rasier, LLC, Respondents, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Appellant, and Jeff Kirk, Defendant. Michael K. Ryan, Sara O'Connor-Kriss, Seattle City Attorney's Office, 701 5th Ave. Ste. 2050, Seattle, WA, 98104-7095, Matthew J. Segal, Kymberly Kathryn Evanson, Pacifica Law Group LLP, 1191 2nd Ave. Ste. 2000, Seattle, … WebMay 20, 2004 · Washington’s Public Disclosure Act was amended in 1987 to restrict the exemptions of the Act. According to Aaron Hugh Caplan, an American Civil Liberties … lexus chicureo

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) …

Category:Hangartner v. City of Seattle - Ballotpedia

Tags:Hangartner v city of seattle

Hangartner v city of seattle

166 Wn.2d 747, MORGAN V. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - MRSC

WebACLU v. City of Seattle: 2009 Brouillet v. Cowles Publishing: 1990 City of Federal Way v. Koenig: 2009 Cowles Publishing Co. v. Murphy: 1981 Hangartner v. City of Seattle: 2004 Harold Carey v. Mason County: 2009 Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe: 1978 Laborers Int'l Union Local No. 374 v. City of Aberdeen: 1982 Nast v. Michels: 1986 Web90 P.3d 26 - HANGARTNER v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. 90 P.3d 37 - PARKLAND LIGHT & WATER CO. v. TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH, ... 90 P.3d 1116 - DeTRAY v. CITY OF OLYMPIA, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. 90 P.3d 1123 - McANDREWS GROUP, LTD., INC. v. EHMKE, ...

Hangartner v city of seattle

Did you know?

WebAug 11, 2005 · Shelley Marie Hall, Stokes Lawrence, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae (Allied Daily Newspapers of Washington, Inc.) ¶ 1 This case arises under the public disclosure act (PDA), chapter 42.17 RCW. WebRichard Germeau, Appellant V. Mason County, Et Al, Respondents :: 2012 :: Washington Court of Appeals, Division II Decisions :: Washington Case Law :: Washington Law :: US Law :: Justia

WebMay 13, 2004 · HANGARTNER v. CITY OF SEATTLE (2004) Reset A A Font size: Print Supreme Court of Washington,En Banc. Rick HANGARTNER Respondent, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Appellant. Citizens Against the Monorail, a political … WebHangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 447-48, 90 P.3d 26 (2004). "[A] party seeking documents must, at a minimum [ ( 1 ) ] provide notice that the request is made …

WebOct 21, 2003 · The City agreed to allow Hangartner to amend his original complaint to include the City's refusal to release the AIA documents. The trial court then amended …

http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/151wn2d/151wn2d0439.htm

WebHangartner: vs. City of Seattle: Number: 151. Wn.2d 439, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) Year: 2004: State: Washington: Court: Washington State Supreme Court: Other lawsuits in … lexus choco coatedWebNast v. Michels was a case before the Washington State Supreme Court in 1986 concerning a ... ACLU v. City of Seattle: 2009 Brouillet v. Cowles Publishing: 1990 City of Federal Way v. Koenig: 2009 Cowles Publishing Co. v. Murphy: 1981 Hangartner v. City of Seattle: 2004 Harold Carey v. Mason County: 2009 Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe: 1978 Laborers Int ... lexus chip shortage 2022http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/166wn2d/166wn2d0747.htm lexus chocolate creamWebHangartner v. City of Seattle was a case before the Washington State Supreme Court in 2004 concerning the volume of a public records request. See also Washington Public … mcc thunderhttp://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/166wn2d/166wn2d0747.htm mcc ticketmasterWebJun 22, 1998 · Because the City waited until after he filed this lawsuit to comply with that request, Bonamy argues that his claims against the City should not have been … lexus chocolate sandwich 76gmWebAug 27, 2015 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wash.2d 439, 448, 90 P.3d 26 (2004). The onus is instead on the agency—necessarily through its employees—to perform “an adequate search” for the records requested. Neigh. All., 172 Wash.2d at 720–21, 261 P.3d 119. To satisfy the agency's burden to show it conducted an adequate search for … lexus christmas ad